English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Dear Editor:  Upon reading the recently published article entitled "Adverse pregnancy outcomes with assisted reproductive technology in non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a case control study" [1], we were compelled to point out that the study design does not conform to the principles of a case-control study. The authors state that the aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes between non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome compared to a control group. However, the study participants were selected on the basis of the specific exposure groups; for case control studies participants are selected on the basis of an outcome of interest. Thus, the authors have conducted a cohort study.

Letter to the Editor: A cohort study and not a case control study