English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We examined differences in adverse drug reactions reported in trials for new drug applications and those reported in early post-marketing phase vigilance (EPPV) for drugs approved between October, 2001 and July, 2003. In EPPV reports, we found that the proportion of adverse drug reactions noted from blood tests (e.g. drug-induced hepatitis, hematology adverse reactions, electrolyte metabolism disorders, and renal dysfunction) was less than that of other adverse drug reactions. We consider that this was because blood tests were not conducted regularly enough and the reason that such reactions are severe when discovered.Since EPPV is considered as phase IV of drug testing, regular blood tests are still required and we feel that it is necessary to carry out pharmacovigilance more thoroughly to ensure the safety of drugs after they have been marketed.

Clinical Evaluation of Early Post-Marketing Phase Vigilance-Features of Adverse Events Noted in Early Post-marketing Phase Vigilance-