English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study explores the relationship between neighborhood’s social capital and burglary victimization by using mail survey data conducted in the urban area of Japan. We examined how crime control effects of social capital vary, depending on changing of geographical range of the “neighborhood” used in the analyses, from 60 to 500 meters in 10 meter increments. We summarize the results as follows: (1) for trust, norms of reciprocity and the principal component score of the social capital index, the larger geographical ranges of “neighborhood” used in analyses are, the stronger their crime control effects are; (2) social participation doesn’t have significant crime control effects; (3) trust shows strong crime control effects even in narrow geographical ranges. These findings suggest that there may be multiple crime control mechanisms through social capital in a certain geographical range of the neighborhood.

gis - riron to ōyō/gis-riron to oyo

Does crime control effect of social capital vary depending on the range of “neighborhood”?: Analyses using GIS and physical distances between residents