English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Većina istraživanja homoparentalnosti, koja su se počela provoditi krajem sedamdesetih i početkom osamdesetih godina 20. stoljeća u anglosaksonskom kontekstu, nije našla dokaza o štetnim ishodima djece lezbijki i gejeva koji bi bili posljedica seksualne orijentacije njihovih roditelja. Te su studije tipično bile ograničene malim uzorcima i uključivanjem samo obitelji lezbijki. Početkom 21. stoljeća počele su se provoditi kvantitativne studije koje uspoređuju ishode djece istospolnih i raznospolnih partnera na temelju slučajnih reprezentativnih uzoraka. Ovaj se rad sustavno osvrće na ta istraživanja, pri čemu se analiza fokusirala na trima točkama metodoloških prijepora koje su identificirane u literaturi o homoparentalnosti: karakteristike uzorka, pitanje operacionalizacije kategorije djece istospolnih parova i uključivanje kontrolne varijable obiteljske stabilnosti. Rezultati većine studija provedenih na slučajnim reprezentativnim uzorcima sukladni su nalazima prijašnjih istraživanja. Manjinu takvih studija koje nalaze neke statistički značajne razlike u štetnim ishodima djece obilježavaju ozbiljne metodološke zamjerke poput umjetnog povećavanja kategorije djece iz obitelji lezbijki i gejeva (primjerice, uključivanjem djece koja moguće ili vjerojatno nikad nisu odrastala u obitelji istospolnog para) i izostanka kontrolne varijable za obiteljsku stabilnost u analizama. Stoga se u ovom osvrtu zaključuje da znanstveno najkredibilnije kvantitativne studije provedene na slučajnim reprezentativnim uzorcima pružaju snažnu potporu zaključku mnoštva ranijih kvalitativnih i kvantitativnih studija provedenih na prigodnim uzorcima – nema uvjerljivih dokaza o razlikama u štetnim ishodima djece koju odgajaju istospolni i raznospolni partneri koje bi se mogle pripisati seksualnoj orijentaciji roditelja.The research on homopaternality started in the late 1970s and early 1980s in the Anglo-Saxon context. A great majority of those studies found no evidence of harmful outcomes for the children of lesbians and gays resulting from their parents’ sexual orientation. Those studies, however, were typically limited by small-size samples and restricted to the analysis of lesbian families. Quantitative studies comparing the outcomes of children from different family structures based on random representative samples have been conducted since the beginning of the 21st century. The present paper systematically reviews that research by focusing on three points of methodological debate identified in the literature on homoparentality: sample characteristics, operationalisation of the category of same-sex partners’ children, and the inclusion of the control for family stability. The results of most quantitative studies based on random representative samples were consistent with the findings of the previous studies. The minority of those studies that did find some differences in harmful outcomes between the children of same-sex and opposite-sex partners were characterised by serious methodological flaws. They ranged from artificially inflating the category of the children of same-sex parents (for instance, by including children who were possibly or probably never raised by a same-sex couple) to omitting a control variable of family stability from the analyses. Therefore, this review concludes that scientifically the most credible quantitative studies support the conclusions of numerous earlier qualitative and quantitative studies conducted using convenience samples – there is no credible evidence that the children raised by same-sex partners fare worse than the children of opposite-sex partners due to the sexual orientation of their parents

revija za sociologiju

Comparing the Outcomes of Children of Same-Sex and Opposite-Sex Partners: Overview of the Quantitative Studies Conducted on Random Representative Samples