English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

U radu su predstavljene aksijalne konture buduće obuhvatne, sistematske i temeljite kritičke valorizacije upotrebe koncepta tranzicije u sociološkom diskursu koji obilježava postsocijalističko razdoblje u Hrvatskoj. U tom su kontekstu naznačene određene terminološke nedoumice, disciplinarno je situiran tranzicijski pristup, ukazano je na korijene njegova pojavljivanja te su predstavljene krucijalne odrednice i ključne premise tranzicijskog modela. Osobita je pozornost posvećena ukazivanju na manjkavosti i različite tipove kritičkih objekcija upućenih tranzicijskom pristupu koji se očituju u sljedećim stavkama: a) mehanicističkom determinizmu i izvjesnom neoevolucionizmu, b) implicitnim teleološkim pretpostavkama, c) svojevrsnom političkom redukcionizmu, d) hipotezi o sekvencijalnosti tranzicije te e) prisutnosti određenih ideoloških primjesa. Na tom se tragu predstavljaju određene modifikacije kojima su se nastojali neutralizirati pojedini nedostaci tranzicijskog pristupa, što je impliciralo odmak od pojedinih rigidnih pretpostavki klasičnoga tranzicijskog modela i proliferaciju niza pristupa koji mogućnost različitih ishoda tranzicijskih procesa ostavljaju posve otvorenom opcijom. Nadalje se tematizira pitanje trenutačnog statusa hrvatskog društva u pogledu odvijanja dinamičkih transformacijskih procesa. Također se propituje heuristički potencijal, eksplanacijska snaga i, uopće, epistemološka opravdanost upotrebe tranzicijskog pristupa. Zbog niza identificiranih manjkavosti pri tom se konstatira neprimjerenost tranzicijskog pristupa za razmatranje razvojne dinamike hrvatskoga društva. Naposljetku se pledira na razvijanje autentičnih konceptualno-analitičkih alata pogodnih za izučavanje dinamičkih društvenih procesa odnosno za makroskopsko seciranje suvremenoga društvenog okruženja. Pri konstrukciji tih teorijskih instrumenata bitno je uvažavati kontekstualne specifičnosti pojedinog društva te primijeniti holistički pristup kojim se zahvaća cjelina društvenog univerzuma odnosno izbjegavaju mogući redukcionizmi implicirani pridavanjem analitičkog primata pojedinom području društvenosti. Izgradnja autentičnih teorijskih alata, podvlači se, pokazuje se neusporedivo plauzibilnijom opcijom od »uvoza« i nekritičke upotrebe u drugim društvenim sredinama sazdanih teorijskih modela.This article provides basic outlines of a prospective, more comprehensive, critical evaluation of the use of the concept of transition in sociological discourse in post-socialist Croatia. Certain terminological confusions were briefly considered, relations among disciplines that address transition were clarified, and historical roots of the transition model – as well as its fundamental determinants and crucial propositions – were indicated. Particular attention was paid to the examination of drawbacks and different critical objections directed at the transition approach. These objections include: a) mechanistic determinism and neo-evolutionism; b) implicit teleological presumptions; c) political reductionism of sorts; d) hypotheses about the sequential character of transition; e) ideological assumptions. Certain revisions aiming to overcome the objections to the transition approach were presented. Those revisions indicated departure from particular rigid assumptions enshrined in the classic transition model and enabled proliferation of different theoretical approaches that allowed the possibility of diverse outcomes of transition processes. Additionally, the status of Croatian society regarding the dynamics of ongoing transformation processes was discussed, and the heuristic potential and epistemological validity of application of the transition approach was examined. Owing to the drawbacks denoted in the article, the transition approach was deemed inappropriate for the analysis of the social dynamics of Croatian society. The urgency for development of authentic conceptual-analytical tools suited for the inquiry of social processes and for macroscopic dissection of the contemporary social environment was emphasized. The construction of such theoretical instruments must be sensitive to specific attributes of a particular society. Furthermore, such instruments should holistically encompass the totality of social universe and, correspondingly, avoid reductionism that may stem from analytical primacy being given to any singular social domain. It was concluded that the development of authentic theoretical tools is considerably more pertinent than the »import« and uncritical application of theoretical models generated in other social environments

What after the (Social) Transition? Critical Remarks Regarding the Use of the Transition Approach in Sociological Examinations of Croatian Society