English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Bourdieuova teorija književnog polja, važan dio njegova ukupnog teorijskog i empirijskog tretiranja polja, polazi od koncepta dvaju »prostora« – prostora pozicija u distribucijama kapitala (stečenog i naslijeđenoga ekonomskog i kulturnog, te društvenog kapitala) i prostora pozicioniranja, što su zapravo ekspresije aktera u polju. Tim ekspresijama akteri nastoje utjecati na vrednovanje vlastite i tuđe pozicije te vlastitih i tuđih proizvoda, pa Bourdieu govori o simboličkim borbama u književnom polju. Teza stožerna u Bourdieuovoj teoriji jest da odnosi moći u polju, to jest odnosi nejednakosti u posjedovanju različitih omjera i količina kapitala, određuju pozicioniranja aktera u polju. U književnom polju, tako bi selekcija objekata i sadržaj književnih kritika trebali korespondirati međusobnim sličnostima i razlikama autora u posjedovanju kapitala. Provjera te teze traži konceptualizaciju i operacionalizaciju interakcija aktera u književnim kritikama. Nastavljajući se na ranije radove o teorijskoj i empirijskoj rekonstrukciji Bourdieuova pristupa poljima u okviru teorija društvenih mreža, u ovome radu autor nastoji pokazati da je tehnika eksponencijalnih modela slučajnih grafova (ERGM) prikladna za operacionalizaciju hijerarhije i borbi u književnom polju. Autor je u tu svrhu proveo sekundarnu analizu binarne mreže međusobnih spomena 35-ero nizozemskih književnih autora 1976. godine u književnim kritikama i esejima, jedinog javno dostupnog uređenog skupa podataka te vrste. Među drugim inferencijalnim tehnikama analize društvenih mreža tehnika ERGM izdvaja se mogućnošću istodobnog ispitivanja više hipoteza o endogenim pravilnostima u mreži interakcija – gdje su lokalna i globalna hijerarhija i borbe predmet teorija društvenih mreža, ali su mogući zaključci o strukturi mreže interakcija relevantni za uvid u polje – te o egzogenim čimbenicima interakcija, to jest sličnostima i razlikama aktera prema njihovim atributima. Zaključno, multivarijatna i longitudinalna primjena ERGM osobito je pogodna za dosljednu operacionalizaciju simboličkih borbi u polju, gdje je kroz više sadržajno različitih i sukcesivno mjerenih mreža moguće u analizu uključiti društveni kapital i sadržajne poddomene interakcija (ekspresija) te ispitivati mehanizme reprodukcije i transformacije književnog i drugih polja.Bourdieu’s theory of literary field – an important part of his theoretical and empirical treatment of fields – was founded on the concept of two »spaces«: the space of positions in the distributions of capital (inherited and acquired economic and cultural capital, and social capital) and the space of position-takings, or expressions of actors in a field. By the means of those expressions, actors attempt to influence evaluation of their and others’ positions and products. Hence, Bourdieu referred to these attempts as »symbolic struggles« in the literary field. The thesis central to Bourdieu’s theory is that relations of power in a field, i.e. relations of inequality in possession of different quantities and compositions of capital, determine position-taking of actors in the field. Within the literary field, selection of the objects and content of literary critique should therefore correspond to similarities and differences in the actors’ endowment with capital. Verification of that thesis required conceptualisation and operationalization of the actors’ interactions in literary critiques. Drawing on earlier work in reconstruction of Bourdieu’s theoretical and empirical approach in the framework of social network analysis (SNA), the author aimed to show that exponential random graph models (ERGM) are appropriate for modelling hierarchy and struggles in the literary field. For that purpose, the author conducted secondary analysis of a binary network consisting of inter-individual mentions of 35 Dutch literary authors in literary essays and interviews from 1976 – the only publicly available dataset of the sort. ERGM stand out among other inferential SNA techniques by their ability to test simultaneously multiple hypotheses about 1) endogenous regularities in a network of interactions – where local and global hierarchy and struggles are formulated within theories of social networks, but are also relevant for insight into the field – and 2) exogenous covariates of interactions, i.e. similarities and differences between actors according to their attributes. In conclusion, multivariate and longitudinal application of ERGM was indicated to be appropriate for a consistent operationalization of symbolic struggles in the field. Multiple successively measured networks that are diverse in content enable the inclusion of social capital and sub-domains of interactions’ meanings into the analysis, and thus the examination of the mechanisms of reproduction and transformation of the literary as well as other fields

revija za sociologiju

Hierarchy and Struggles in the Network of Literary Critiques: Operationalization of Bourdieu’s Theory of Literary Field and Symbolic Struggles with Exponential Random Graph Models