English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The effects of two different ways of counting fault areas, that are the seismic fault area and the entire ruptured fault area, on the strong ground motions from the faults 30 km and 50 km long were small for peak ground accelerations and comparatively large for peak ground velocities and response spectra in the longer period range. On the other hand, the effects on the strong ground motions from the fault 200 km long were little for peak ground accelerations or peak ground velocities while the effects were a little for response spectra in the period range longer than 3 seconds.

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT WAYS OF COUNTING FAULT AREA FOR ASPERITY MODEL OF CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES ON FAULT PARAMETERS AND PREDICTED STRONG GROUND MOTIONS