English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background. Only few direct comparative studies evaluated the effectiveness of telemedicine-guided home blood pressure (tele-HBPM) compared to 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in assessing blood pressure (BP) and BP control. Material and methods. This prospective clinical trial included patients with arterial hypertension, with (n = 23) and without (n = 18) chronic kidney disease and normal volunteers (n = 16). All subjects underwent with a 1-month interval twice one-week of BP monitoring with office BP (3 measurements at 2 visits), 24 h-ABPM and tele-HBPM during 7 consecutive days. Results. Mean (SD) BP levels were 128/77 [19/11] mm Hg and 126/75 [14/9] mm Hg for tele-HBPM, 129/78 [17/11] mm Hg and 127/75 [14/9] mm Hg for daytime-ABPM, and 133/77 [23/12] mm Hg and 130/74 [17/11] mm Hg for office BP, all respectively at the first and the second measurement periods. Blood pressure and BP control were comparable between the two out-of-office techniques. Conclusion. Both out-of-office techniques (tele-HBPM and 24h-ABPM) show good agreement for systolic as well as diastolic BP, and are equally effective in assessing BP and BP control, explicitly during daytime.

arterial hypertension

Effectiveness of telemedicine-guided home blood pressure compared to 24 h-ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with and without chronic kidney disease.