English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Among the constitutional instruments of citizen security, the Writ of Injunction remained, until recently, without legislative regulation. The legislative omission did not prevent the citizens to appropriate the institute and widely used to demand the judiciary the realization of fundamental rights. After a slow process of consolidation, the law of the injunction was created in 2016. However, in the face of theories that favor a return of popular sovereignty to constitutional debates, especially popular constitutionalism and democratic constitutionalism, and the dialogical theories that indicate the necessary debate between the different institutions and powers, it is necessary to inquire about the necessary procedural openness Of the writ of injunction to the formulas of popular participation in the constitutional jurisdiction. From this theoretical concept, the purpose of this article is to examine the Law of regulation of the Writ of Injunction, using documentary research, case law and literature review in the field of constitutional law.

A Lei 13.300/16 que regula o Mandado de Injunção: opção ativista ou dialógica?