English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this study was to develop a CO₂ emission factor for refuse plastic fuel (RPF) combustion facilities, and calculate the CO₂ emissions from these facilities. The CO₂ reduction from using these facilities was analyzed by comparing CO₂ emission to facilities using fossil fuels. The average CO₂ emission factor from RPF combustion facilities was 59.7 Mg CO₂/TJ. In addition, fossil fuel and RPF use were compared using net calorific value (NCV). Domestic RPF consumption in 2011 was 240,000 Mg/yr, which was compared to fossil fuels using NCV. B-C oil use, which has the same NCV, was equal to RPF use. In contrast, bituminous and anthracite were estimated at 369,231 Mg/yr and 355,556 Mg/yr, respectively. In addition, the reduction in CO₂ emissions due to the alternative fuel was analyzed. CO₂ emissions were reduced by more than 350 Mg CO₂/yr compared to bituminous and anthracite. We confirmed that using RPF, an alternative fuel, can reduce CO₂ emissions.

Estimated CO2 Emissions and Analysis of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) as an Alternative Fuel