English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

−49− Synthesiology English edition Vol.7 No.2 pp.49-64 (Sep. 2014) When there was need for thermophysical quantity data, it was a common practice for the researcher to look through data books or databases for the material that was the subject of interest. However, the required thermophysical quantity data often could not be found. Even if some data was found, it was unclear whether the data could be assigned to the exact material of interest. This situation is not so much a problem if one simply needed the thermophysical quantity data as a rough guideline, but such data were insufficient for realizing the maximum function or guaranteeing safety, and the researcher him/herself had to measure the thermophysical quantities or subcontract such measurement to a specialized lab. If measurement is necessary, the next problem is how to choose the appropriate measurement method and how to evaluate reliability of thermophysical quantity data measured by the method. However, there is no such information or guideline yet based on agreement among the academic and technological community.

A social system for production and utilization of thermophysical quantity data