English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper focuses on the figure of Ali , found along with Maometto and sowers of scandal and schism in Dante’s Divina Commedia ( Inferno 28). While early commentators on the poem variously identify Ali as a companion or disciple of Maometto ’s, or his heretical teacher, modern commentators identify him as ‘Alī b. Abī Ṭālib, Muḥammad’s cousin and son-in-law. Both explain his condemnation as due to a religious schism he caused: according to the former, Ali inspired or pursued the division of Christianity provoked by Maometto ; according to the latter, he was responsible for the division of the Muslim community into Sunnites and Shi‘ites. Nevertheless, these interpretations do not clarify why Ali is not condemned by Dante along with heresiarchs but rather alongside characters responsible for violent divisions within social and political contexts. An analysis of the sources on ‘Alī and the Shī‘a available in Europe up to the beginning of the 14 th century shows that Dante, unlike his early commentators, relied on pseudo-historical biographies of Muḥammad in which the division between Sunnites and Shi‘ites, ascribed to ‘Alī, was interpreted as a political phenomenon concerning the dispute over authority and territorial control between Sunni Caliphs in the East and Shi‘i imams in the West. By reading Inferno 28 from this perspective, through the social and political view expressed by Dante in the Monarchia , it is possible to infer that Dante considered Muḥammad as responsible for the subversion of the universal empire, and ‘Alī as responsible for a further fragmentation of the imperial authority.

From ‘Alī to Dante’s «Alì»: A Western Medieval Understanding of «Shī'a»