English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Juan Andres’ treaty Confusion o confutacion de la secta Mahometica y del Alcoran is a meaningful example of how the typically medieval topics of anti-Islamic polemics are adapted into the Early Modern literally moulds. The interest in confuting Islam with the aid of the Qur’ān had been fuelling the literature of religious controversy long before Juan Andres converted to Christianity and took up the quill to rebut his old faith. Nevertheless, his analysis of the content of the Qur’ān differs from the ones conducted before him. Moreover, the Quranic quotations inserted in Juan Andres’ polemical text happen to coincide with the Latin translation of the Qur’ān commissioned by Egidio da Viterbo and its glosses. Therefore, the aim of this paper is twofold: firstly, to revindicate Juan Andres’ autonomy and independence from Medieval polemics; secondly, to highlight the similarities and correspondence between Juan Andres’ Confusion o confutacion and Egidio da Viterbo’s Latin translation of the Qur’ān.

“No es esto sino hystorias de los antiguos”: Between Medieval and Early Modern Narrations in Juan Andrés’ “Confusión”