English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This judgment is the second in favor of applying the procedure of habeas corpus for the release of an animal. The novelty of the latter is the neat motivation within it to recognize that great apes are subjects of rights and to apply the procedure of habeas corpus to a non-human subject . Special attention must be paid to the ethical arguments and criticism of the Judge, against the fact that Argentine legal system considers animals as ‘things’.

derecho animal

Effectiveness of habeas corpus to free a chimpanzee (Cecilia). Commentary on the Judgment of November 3, 2016 Third Trial Court of the State of Mendoza (Argentina)