English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This comment concerns the judgment of the Federal Criminal Court of Appeal of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (Argentina), 18th December 2014, on the habeas corpus which was filed for the protection of an oranguntan in the Zoo of Buenos Aires. In its decision, the court refers the case to the Criminal, Misdemeanor Offenses Justice of Buenos Aires, but at the same time, it states that, from a dynamic and not static legal interpretation, the animal should be recognized as a subject of rights, as non-human subjects (animals) have rights, too, and that means they deserve protection by the corresponding field of competency.

derecho animal

Application of Hábeas Corpus for Orangutan Sandra. Comment on the Sentence of the Federal Court of Criminal Appeals of the City of Buenos Aires, 18th December 2014