English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Let the 3-parameter family of vector fields given by(A) y∂ ∂x + [x2 + µ + y(ν0 + ν1x + x3)] ∂ ∂y with (x, y, µ, ν0, ν1) ∈ R2 × R3 ([DRS1]). We prove that if µ → −∞ then (A) is C0-equivalent to(B) [y − (bx + cx2 − 4x3 + x4)]∂ ∂x + ε(x2 − 2x) ∂ ∂y for ε ↓ 0, b, c ∈ R. We prove that there exists a Hopf bifurcation of codimension 1 when b = 0 and also that, if b = 0, c = 12 and ε > 0 then there exists a Hopf bifurcation of codimension 2. We study the “Canard Phenomenon” and the homoclinic bifurcation in the family (B). We show that when ε ↓ 0, b = 0 and c = 12 the attracting limit cycle, which appears in a Hopf bifurcation of codimension 2, stays with “small size” and changes to a “big size” very quickly, in a sense made precise here

Canard cycles and Homoclinicic bifurcation in a 3 parameter family of vector fields on the plane