English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

U radu se analizira povezanost političkog utjecaja uprofesionalnim strukturama javnih institucija s korupcijskimrizikom. Cilj je na temelju kvalitativnih podataka provjeritipogoduje li općenito politički utjecaj i političko kadroviranjeu profesionalnim javnim institucijama (nasuprottransparentnosti i profesionalnoj autonomiji) razvoju iotpornosti korupcije. Kvalitativno empirijsko istraživanjemetodom polustrukturiranog intervjua provedeno je sa 60sudionika iz 10 zemalja, podijeljenih u dvije skupine sobzirom na indeks percepcije korupcije. Kao pokazateljiprisutnosti političkog utjecaja u javnim strukturama ispitanisu iskustvo sugovornika o prohodnosti institucionalnihusluga, iskustvo o prisutnosti političkoga kadroviranja uprofesionalnim strukturama te iskustvo o mogućnostipredvidivog upravljanja karijerom na osnovi jasnihinstitucionalnih kriterija. Rezultati intervjua pokazuju daizmeđu društava koja se međusobno razlikuju premapercepciji korupcije postoji iskustvena razlika u prisutnostinavedenih pokazatelja te da se politički utjecaj uprofesionalnim strukturama javnih institucija može smatratičimbenikom korupcijskog rizika.The paper analyzes the correlation of political influence inthe professional structures of public institutions withcorruption risk. The goal is to determine, based onqualitative data, how favourable general political influenceand political appointments in professional public institutions(as opposed to transparency and professional autonomy) arefor the development and sustainability of corruption.Qualitative empirical research using the method of semi--structured interviews was conducted with 60 participantsfrom 10 countries, divided into two groups according to theCorruption Perceptions Index. Indicators of the presence ofpolitical influence in public structures are: participants’experience on the mobility of institutional services, experienceof the presence of political staffing in professional structures,and the experience of the possibility of predictable careermanagement based on clear institutional criteria. The resultsof the interviews show that between societies which differaccording to the perception of corruption there is anexperiential difference in the presence of these indicators,and that the political influence of the professional structuresof public institutions can be considered as a factor ofcorruption risk

Society and Corruption: Political Influence in Professional Structures of Public Institutions as a Risk Factor for Corruption