English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Hierarchical clustering is a stronger extension of one of today's most influential unsupervised learning methods: clustering. The goal of this method is to create a hierarchy of clusters, thus constructing cluster evolutionary history and simultaneously finding clusterings at all resolutions. We propose four traits of interest for hierarchical clustering algorithms: (1) empirical performance, (2) theoretical guarantees, (3) balance (the minimum ratio between cluster sizes), and (4) scalability. While a number of algorithms are designed to achieve one to two of these traits at a time, there exist none that achieve all four.Inspired by Bateni et al.'s scalable and empirically successful Affinity Clustering [NeurIPs 2017], we introduce Affinity's successor, Matching Affinity Clustering. Like its predecessor, Matching Affinity Clustering maintains strong empirical performance, even outperforming Affinity when the dataset is size 2n and clusters are balanced, and uses Massively Parallel Communication as its distributed model. Designed to maintain provably balanced clusters, we show that our algorithm achieves a (1/3-ε)-approximation for Moseley and Wang's revenue (the dual to Dasgupta's cost) when the data set is of size 2n, and a (1/9-ε)-approximation in general. We prove the former approximation is tight, and also that Affinity Clustering cannot do better than a 1/O(n)-approximation. In addition, we see that our algorithm empirically performs similarly to Affinity Clustering and k-Means, outperforming many state-of-the-art serial algorithms. Along the way, we also introduce an efficient k-sized maximum matching algorithm in the MPC model.

Matching Affinity Clustering: Improved Hierarchical Clustering at Scale with Guarantees