English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: ";Times New Roman";; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: FR; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">From a game-theoretic point of view, “A Doll’s House” displays a trust game. A classic game-theoretic approach enables to model the behavior of the characters but it does not suffice to explain it since neither the backward induction solution of the game nor its efficient solution correspond to their decisions in the story. A psychological game-theoretic approach helps to explain the choices for it takes into account guilt aversion and reciprocity considerations.</span

Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House” as a psychological trust game with guilt and reciprocity