English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

<p>Where most literature explains Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) communication through Resource Dependency and Institutional Theories, this study investigates how the emergence and maintenance of an infrastructure for communication influences organizational communicative behavior. The infrastructure for communication is a repertoire of materials that act as a tacit framework for the preferred forms of communicative strategy and instrumentation among a community of organizations. This is a longitudinal study of the controversy surrounding Nike’s supply chain from 1993 to 2004. To draw conclusions about the nature of an infrastructure requires a form of analysis known as infrastructural inversion, which is a reflective practice that involves assessing the communication and interaction of actors to ascertain the relevant patterns that impact behavior. The main finding of the study is that infrastructure shaped how the organizations behaved by acting as a coordinating device for the symbolic and material qualities of inter-organizational communicative strategy and instrumentation.</p

CSR Infrastructure for Communication and the Nike Controversy