English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper, we compare empirically the performance of some adaptive MCMC methods, that is, Adaptive Metropolis (AM) algorithm, Single Component Adaptive Metropolis (SCAM) algorithm and Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis (DRAM) algorithm. The context is the simulation of non-standard discrete distributions. The performance criterion used is the precision of the frequency estimator. An application to a Bayesian hypothesis testing problem shows the superiority of the DRAM algorithm over the other considered sampling schemes.

On Estimating Non-standard Discrete Distributions Using Adaptive MCMC Methods