English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper considers Andreas Predohl’s theory, arguing that it applied to both the Nazi project and post-war European integration. Predohl maintained that tension arises from a difference between economic and political spaces when economic space transcends national borders. After the Industrial Revolution, Predohl saw concentric world economic poles emerging successively in Europe, the United States, and the Soviet Union. There were two ways to reconstruct the European pole: the Nazi project and European integration. Predohl’s idea that political and economic space should be harmonised is worth reconsidering amid present economic challenges.

Andreas Predöhl’s Theory of the Integration of Economic and Political Space