English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 4pt; line-height: 12pt; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: ";Times New Roman";,";serif";; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt;">The recent resurgence of income inequality in the United States has spawned a wide-ranging discussion to its causes, which has often focused on America's historically high trade deficit in the past two decades. Our paper revisits this issue by investigating the latest trends in the U.S. income disparity from 1985 to 2007, and systematically examining the factors that might have influenced the income inequality. To better understand income disparity, three different measures are employed: Gini, Theil and Atkinson indices. Results show that, only in the cases of Gini and Atkinson, international trade explains a part of income inequality, but it surely cannot be the whole story. Other factors, such as the net migration rate, the changing role of women, and the sectoral distribution of employment also play important roles in accounting for America's income inequality.</span></p

A Reappraisal of Trade Deficit and Income Inequality in the United States: 1985-2007