English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper examines the antecedents and consequences of superior downward influence tactics in Malaysian companies.  The literature review revealed that downward influence tactics are useful but practically challenging.  Researchers have identified downward influence tactics such as inspirational appeal, consultation, exchange, pressure, ingratiation, and rational persuasion as commonly used influence tactics by superior to change the behavior of subordinates.  The purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework for relating different outcomes of downward influence tactics and the determinants under which such influences are exercised.  The outcomes are measured in terms of differences in subordinates’ satisfaction with supervision and organizational citizenship behavior when subjected to supervisory downward influence tactics.  Understanding different influence tactics affect the outcomes which can provide guidelines for superior in using the suitable influence tactics to increase the organizational citizenship behavior and satisfaction in organizations.  Leadership styles, organizational context and mediating variables of role ambiguity and subordinates’ competency level were also investigated.</p

international business research

Examining the Determinants and Outcomes of Superior Downward Influence Tactics: The Mediating Impact of Role Ambiguity and Subordinates’ Competence Level