English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this article, by the clinical observation of four prostate stents implantation methods to treat BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) based on 52 cases, the disadvantages and advantages of different methods are evaluated. For 52 BHP patients, four methods including the urocyst minimal incision prostate stents implantation, the prostate stents implantation in cystoscope orthophoria, the B ultrasonic cystoscope stents implantation, and the ultrasonic guidance prostate stents implantation are respectively adopted, and the prostate urethra lengths are in 4.0-5.6 cm, and the average length is 5 cm. The results show that 52 patients were all successful in one implantation, and in the successive 10-45 months, two patients of them changed to the prostate cystostomy after operation, and one patient of them took out the stents and was adopted by the prostate enucleation above pubis. And the conclusions indicate that the B ultrasonic cystoscope prostate stents implantation method is better than other methods, with simple operation, short operation time, and definite treatment effect.

Clinical Observation of Four Prostate Stents Implantation Methods to Treat BPH Based on 52 Cases