English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

An effective accreditation mechanism should be able to demarcate between a good programme and a bad programme without any bias or preconceived notions of the assessor. This should be achieved through the analysis of variability of performance of programmes in various well-defined dimensions of quality. Moreover, the process should be as objective as possible to avoid the criticisms about the correctness of the decision. Considering these factors, a study has been planned to analyze the effectiveness of a well-established accreditation process. Accreditation process of National Board of Accreditation (NBA), India is taken as a case for the analysis. The study reveals the dominance of subjective judgments and overall perceptions of evaluators in the decision of accreditation status of a programme

Subjective Judgments and Overall Perception Dominate The Accreditation Processes - A Case Study from India