English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The main objective of the research was the question of the responsibility for failure to decisions of constitutional justice authorities in the federal territories. The author considers the reasons of nonperformance of decisions of constitutional Justice authorities, discourses about types of responsibility. In the article the positive experience in this problem solving by improvement procuracy’s relations is discussed. The author suggests possible ways of solution for nonperformance of decisions of constitutional (statutory) courts in Russian federal territories. Also specific proposals focused on caution judicatum solvi-execution of the constitutional (statutory) courts’ decisions-are offered here.

Some Aspects of Liability for Nonperformance of Constitutional Justice Authorities Decisions of the Territories in the Russian Federation