English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Great events often cause brutal confrontation within history and biography that always create tension – at least inmodern history – a memorialistic wave. As such, the quantity of Banat library memoirs about World War I andpro-union action in the province is not surprising.These include numerous passages concerning the entry and presence of Serb forces in the Banat. This occurredin the eastern and central part of Banat, an area with an absolute majority of Romanian inhabitants. The referencesare more valuable the less they are about these events in our historiography.In this study, things are searching in one hand. However this stage is essential knowledge that will be muchimproved when linked with memorialistic Serbian and Swabian sources.Almost all the Romanian memorialistic text mentions the fall of 1918 and the behaviour of the Serbs during thewithdrawal. Fortunately, in the ’30s of the last century, Professor Ilieşiu from Timişoara, produced a questionnairecontaining some questions about this episode. This questionnaire was distributed to all villages of Banat, largeand small. The answers – with few exceptions – highlight a negative image, the brutal behaviour of the troops, achain of abuse and the suspicion that the Romanian troops were not going –despite their temporary mandate-toleave the province. The picture of the Serbian army is that of an oriental horde, no supply lines and generally nomodern military mores. It unscrupulously consumes the resources of the local people. The soldiers are primitiveand unruly drunks-.The only sympathetic figures are the Romanian soldiers from Timoc, who attempt to defend the people. Theynotify communities about the reprisals against them, and do translation service for Romanians. Their solidarityremains to be studied in its own rightThe arrival of Serbs with the mission to maintain order, found the Banat pacified. The Romanian NationalCouncil and National Guards pacified the region and began introducing Romanian government. Much more thanthat, under the armistice agreement in Belgrade in November 1918, the Serbian military presence does not removebut maintains the old Hungarian administration system, seen here as representing the foreign and Hungarian.their return was seen as a restoration. The Serbs gave signs that they wished to maintain the occupation untilannexation of the entire Banat in Serbia. Toward this end they stopped the delegation to Alba-Iulia. All this ledto the beginning of resistance. In some parts-Naidăş for example- detachments moved to armed struggle. In otherregions, Romanians returning from the front, engaged in open battle and defeated the Serb units. Volunteers fromthe Old Kingdom -were sent on special missions in the Banat to report to Romanian Headquarters on the situationand to prepare the people for possible resistance. It was not necessary. b e Serbs finally withdrew but not beforelooting everything from the industrial products to herds of cattle. But military conflict was avoided. Eventuallya border was established between Serbia and Romania that would be the most stable of all that were fixed in thepeace treaties of Versailles, a sign that balance and intelligence had prevailed.

Ocupaţia sârbă din Banat în memorialistica bănăţeană / Serbian Occupation in Banat Memories (1918–1919)