English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this work is to discuss the stereotyping of the meaning effects that emerge in the legal discourse of the Maria da Penha Law. The hypothesis is that the law, which sought to include females in the order of legal discourse, (re-) affirms the marginalization of Brazilian women. The study is guided by the following theoretical contributions: the discursive perspective of the French approach, Foucault’s concepts of Archaeology and Genealogy, and Derrida’s deconstruction theory. The results lead to the conclusion that this particular law is inevitably affected by subjectivity having meaning effects that maintain the power of submission, beliefs, and values that intervene in the discursive practices, the cultural dimension, and the historical and collective experience of the subjects.

Juridical discourse as la brisure: a deconstructive-discursive analysis of the Maria da Penha law