English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Beam and trap methods find incompatible results for the lifetime of theneutron: the former delivers a value which is about $8.7\pm2.1$ s longer thanthe latter. Very recently (1906.10024) it has been proposed that the inverseZeno effect (IZE) could be responsible for the shorter lifetime in trapexperiments. Here, we compare two different models of measurement, one obtainedby bang-bang measurements and by a continuous measurement: the IZE turns out tobe in both cases very similar, showing that the results do not depend on thedetails of the measurement process.

Modelling the inverse Zeno effect for the neutron decay