English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this study was to evaluate the maxillary skeletal and dentoalveoler transversal widths in class I, class II and class III malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: The CBCT images of 68 patients (30 female, 38 male) with 25 skeletal class 1 (0 ≤ ANB ≤ 4), 22 skeletal class 2 (4 ≤ ANB) and 21 skeletal class 3 (0 ≥ ANB) were included. Maxillary base width, maxillary alveolar width, distance between maxillary first molars, palatal base width, palatal alveolar width, the angulation of right and left maxillar first molars were measured using Mimics Software (Materialise, Ann Arbor, Mich). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Krıuskall Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test were used for statistical evaluations. RESULTS: The highest difference for maxillary skeletal width was between class I and class II groups as 0.68 mm (p=0,675). Although it was not statistically significant, the mean difference between class I and class III groups was 4.46 mm (95% GA, -4.26 mm, 13.10 mm). This difference was 2.92 mm (95% GA, 5.57 mm, 11.43 mm) between class II and class III groups. CONCLUSION: Skeletal and dental transversal dimensions were similar between sagittal anomalies with mild to moderate severity.

Comparison of Skeletal And Dental Transversal Maxillary Dimensions Between Various Malocclusions