English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) aims to simplify performance, interpretation, and reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).1 PI-RADS v2 introduced probability scores (assessment categories, Table 1), which indicate the likelihood of clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥7)2 based upon MRI findings. PI-RADS v2 has been validated as accurate for detection of cancers and improves interobserver agreement. 3 Despite this, in our experience, use of PI-RADS v2 scores in practice is variable. This study evaluated a method to improve use of PI-RADS v2 scores by using a plan-do-study-act (PDSA) analysis.  Table 1  Summary of Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS) version 2 assessment categories

canadian urological association journal

Standardized reporting templates with mandatory reporting fields and “pick-list” options improve use of Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 in clinical practice: A plan-do-study-act analysis