English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The objective of this research is to analyze the concept of citizenship for the purpose of filing popular action lawsuits. As an instrument of control of the Public Administration, the popular action lawsuit can be proposed by any citizen, which is legitimized by LXXIII of article 5 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution and is disciplined by Law n. 4717/65. Moreover, paragraph 3 of article 1 of Law n. 4717/65 states that the plaintiff must prove his status as a citizen in order to file the popular action lawsuit, by means of his voter registration or equivalent document. The requirement set forth by Law 4717/65 restricts the concept of citizen, by limiting its use exclusively to people with demonstrable political rights through their voter ID or equivalent documents. This study concludes that the concept of citizenship currently covers not only political rights, but also social and civil rights, which is why the term citizen, for purposes of filing the popular action lawsuit, must be broad, not limited to the contours established by Law 4.717/65, which in this aspect is not included in the Federal Constitution. This paper utilized the hypothetical-deductive method with literature review.

A amplitude do conceito de cidadania para efeito de propositura da ação popular