English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Judicial decisions complying with Public Policies are inefficient as they are not currently enforceable obligations. Furthermore, the democratic rule of law requires alternative ways of conflict resolution resulting from the many collisions of fundamental human rights and interests. Both 2nd and 3rd dimensions call for collective tutelage, which, essentially, requires efficient government action. Nonetheless, dispute resolution should implement public policies considering fundamental norms and the application of constitutional procedural law with the values and principles already established in Brazil’s legal order. This paper’s methodology utilized the deductive-hypothetical with theoretical-bibliographic literature review.

A implantação de políticas públicas pela solução judicial dialogada