English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The proof of any homicide ought to be supported by a direct or indirect expert witness report. Moreover, the Brazilian Code of Criminal Procedure deems it essential when the scene of the crime has remnants of the criminal act. Because of this, any evidence of murder should be based on such forensic tests. When this is impossible, the judiciary resorts to witness arguments, which may serve to support the magistrate’s conviction. Nonetheless, any other evidence can be a replacement for the expert report when the crime scene is full of residue that enable forensic tests. Therefore, the magistrate should refuse the victim’s death certificate as a replacement for the expert witness report because it does not meet the necessary requirements for it to be characterized as such. Without the latter, any other kind of evidence is useless in supporting the judge’s conviction. In any case, this is the way that the Brazilian Criminal Procedure Law shows its preference for the formal truth.

A (in) admissibilidade da certidão de óbito como prova substitutiva de exame de corpo de delito direto ou indireto