English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The use of foreign elements is a discursive strategy that has been largely utilized by constitutional judges, as if it were part of a global trend. However, this practice has several critiques related to its legitimacy (methodological difficulties and sovereignty objections). In light of this, this paper defines the discourse patterns of the STF (Brazilian Supreme Court –Supremo Tribunal Federal) in relation to the use of foreign precedents for its reasoning. Through the inductive method and quantitative and qualitative analyses, this study carefully selected and analyzed decisions of the STF, from the years 1998 to 2007, that specifically used this strategy. Moreover, in the first phase of this research, one can perceive that this argumentative strategy fulfills multiple purposes, playing a merely ancillary role in the hermeneutic work of the court.

Abertura e diálogo entre as cortes constitucionais: identificação dos padrões de utilização pelo STF do argumento de direito comparado