English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article makes a comparative analysis of three sociological theories on crime: Edwin H. Sutherland's Theory of Differential Association (or Social Learning), Michael R. Gottfredson's and Travis Rirch’s Theory of Self-Control, and the Anomie (or strain) Theory by Robert K. Merton. Our analysis shows that these three theories can be understood as convergent and complementary. We conclude by pointing out that, among so many sociological theories of crime, these three can be used for sociological analysis, so that one fills the gaps of the other. Thus, we do not need new sociological theories of crime, but rather a use of theories that complement and explain transversally the phenomena of crime.

Teorias sociológicas sobre a criminalidade: análise comparativa de três teorias complementares