English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article studies the crisis developed in the Mayoralty of Tegucigalpa caused by the interpretation that several indigenous peoples gave to certain articles of the Political Constitution of the Spanish Monarchy, during its second period of validity from 1820. This Magna Carta introduced a series of liberal innovations, among them the abolition of caste distinctions (Indians, blacks, mulattos) and states (ecclesiastical, noble, common). Based on this, several indigenous peoples claimed that the Constitution exempted them from paying the stately tribute that had been imposed on them in 1523, thus contradicting the local authorities of the Spanish Empire, who were entitled to charge the right in the name of the King. This confl ict of constitutional interpretation in tax matters was the fi rst of its kind in the constitutional life of Honduras, so that its study allows an approximation to the conformation of democratic institutions in the country. The research has been carried out using documentation of the time contained in the Colonial Fund of the National Archive of Honduras, using a comparative methodology to analyze the texts.

El Derecho Señorial en la Constitución de 1812: Un problema de Interpretación Jurídica