English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

After several questions, it is made a doctrinal analysis of the notarial judgment of capacity, as problematic judgment that the notary makes, in reason of the performance of his duties. It is debated about his exclusive character or not in the public scriptures, and the consequences of his absence in both material and formal ways, as well as its willful or fraudulent appreciation by the notary public. Special reference is offered about the notarial judgment of capacity in people with psychic or intellectual disability, based on the postulates of the Convention of the Rights of the People with Disability, approved in New York, in 2006.

Díez interrogantes sobre el juicio notarial de capacidad: Un intento de posibles respuestas