English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The widely-quoted ‘Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics’ refers to the influence numerical data has in our everyday lives, as well as on policy makers of all disciplines. It has been erroneously attributed to Benjamin Disraeli, but probably originated from others[1]. While numerical data and meaningful information derived are critical in any research enterprise, they are also subject to error, both unintended and fraudulent. Recently, two widely-circulated articles in prominent lay journals [1, 2] have called attention to these concerns, and it behooves all of us in the academic and clinical practice communities, along with the pharmaceutical and medical device industries to review the issues and strive to correct whatever deficiencies exist. This is a daunting task. However, it is an effort we owe our patients in providing them with safe and effective care. Public trust depends on integrity and objectivity of all the players, a goal remaining for the future! However, the immediate priorities are erroneous reporting related to funding pressures and the pursuit of statistical significance (p

‘Lies, damned lies, and statistics’: pharmaceutical, device, and academic enterprises ‘in the dock’