English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The processes of national reconciliation grounded on the acknowledgment of the violation of Human Rights have been accomplished in different countries in order to strengthen the current democracies. In this article we will focus on the Chilean case, which, in recent history, has attempted to move forward in the process of post-dictatorship reconciliation.The idea of reconciliation follows the logic of the rhetoric of branding; that is, it is sustained on the argument that the victims have been left branded after the traumatic experience perpetrated against them. In this process, the constitution of victim category and the consequent reparation are at the center of the process of reconciliation.The victim category has been used as the articulating axis of the struggles around the issue of Human Rights. Nevertheless, this process has helped to fix such identity in an essential, natural and homogeneous way. In this article we intend to question this construction in order to, on one hand, show its contingent character and its constant redefinition process; and on the other, contribute to opening up other spaces of political action in Chile today.

Reconciliación y construcción de la categoría víctima: Implicaciones para la acción política en Chile