English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article attempts to provide a revision of the current guidelines of Chilean jurisprudence regarding the right of not selfincriminate as well as posterior scotfree (concomitant) acts, to subsequently address similarities between both legal concepts. It intends to investigate whether traditional answers by which an individual renounces to the penalty for a crime in favour of concealing his criminal act are enougt, or if is necessary y to direct this interrogation towards a more diverse perspective.

El derecho a no incriminarse y su vinculación con los actos posteriores copenados. Comentarios sobre algunos casos de la jurisprudencia chilena