English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The juridical response to cases of serious human rights violations in Spain —particularly, the literal application of the internal law to crimes committed during the Franco regime— raises the problem about the sufficiency of this formula to achieve transitional justice purposes, specifically, the right to justice and the fight against the impunity. In this sense, there are arguments aimed to demonstrate the need to deconstruct and reformulate the legal sphere facing such cases, incorporating some categories of international law and other ethical-political sources, such as memory. This article analyzes the reasoning of the Provincial Court of Madrid in judgement 640/2018 on a case of «stolen children», as an example of simplistic application of Law, and proposes a more complex interpretation which ultimately has an impact on the direct application of the imprescriptibility of criminal action in these cases. PERALTA JORDÁN REfLExIóN EN TORNO A LA SENTENCIA 640/2018 SOBRE NIñOS ROBADOS DURANTE EL RéGIMEN fRANqUISTA 82

Reflexión en torno a la sentencia 640/2018 sobre niños robados durante el régimen franquista