English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article argues that Ibero-American legal theory has misunderstood Jeremy Waldron’s theory of legal reasoning, displaying it as a formalist theory of adjudication, and Waldron’s view as exclusive positivism. This originates in a distorted reading of his theory of law, which is explained, in turn, by the image of Waldron as Dworkin’s opponent, constructed by constitutional scholars. This article shows that Waldron holds a “dworkinian” theory of legal reasoning, which works as a link between his theory of democracy and his more recent theory of human dignity. Both features have been virtually ignored in Spanish-speaking academic circles.

teoría “dworkiniana” del razonamiento jurídico de Jeremy Waldron: el eslabón ignorado