English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolEl trabajo reconstruye y analiza criticamente la respuesta de Jeremy Waldron a importantes problemas sobre politica y derecho, justicia y autoridad. Waldron reivindica al mismo tiempo una tesis no esceptica sobre la existencia los derechos morales-politicos, una tesis esceptica sobre la existencia de procedimientos epistemicos superiores para identificarlos, y una tesis positiva sobre la legitimidad politica (mayoritarismo participativo). El trabajo argumenta que su respuesta solo resulta consistente si se anade un cuarto vertice: el presupuesto de “igualdad de agencia y capacidad epistemica” en los portadores de derechos. Pero su introduccion requiere abandonar y redefinir dos de los otros elementos, lo que conduce finalmente a las respuestas tipicas del deliberativismo epistemico. Las criticas de Waldron a la revision judicial se reinterpretan sobre esa nueva base EnglishThe article reconstructs and critically analyzes Jeremy Waldron’s responses to major problems on law and politics, justice and authority. Waldron claims at the same time a non-skeptical thesis about the existence of moral-political rights a skeptical thesis about the existence of more accurate epistemic procedures to identify them, and a positive thesis about political legitimacy (participatory majoritarianism). The paper argues that his theory is consistent only if a fourth vertex, implicit in the theory, is added (the “equality of agency and epistemic capacity” of rights-holders). But this explicit addition requires abandoning and redefining two of the other elements, and this eventually conducts us to the typical claims of epistemic deliberativism. Waldron’s criticisms to judicial review are reinterpreted on these new grounds

DERECHOS, ESCEPTICISMO Y MAYORITARISMO: UN TRIÁNGULO IMPOSIBLE. UNA CRÍTICA A LA TEORÍA DE LA LEGITIMIDAD POLÍTICA DE JEREMY WALDRON