English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

ABS TRACT Ob jec ti ves: Although there are a number of studies on the costs and efficacy of the drugs which are used in in vitro fertilization (IVF), the data obtained in antagonist cycles of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) cases are still controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate follicular development, pregnancy outcome and cost-effectiveness comparing r-FSH and HP-u FSH in antagonist cycles of PCOS cases. Material and Methods: A total of 102 patients were included in the study. Patients were treated using the same stimulation protocol. r-FSH (n= 54) or HP-u FSH (n= 48) were given according to the clinician’s choice and the patient’s preference. Results: r-FSH treatment required significantly less amount to induce follicular development and resulted in higher plasma levels of estradiol on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection. Although pregnancy rate in the r FSH group was higher than HP u FSH group (40.7% vs. 33.3%), the difference was not statistically significant. Total FSH dose was significantly lower in r FSH group comparet to HP-uFSH (1396.3 ± 131.6 iu vs.1820.14 ± 174.6 iu). Conclusion: r-FSH is more efficient than HP-u FSH in terms of total FSH dose. The Follicular development and endometrial thickness on the day of hCG were better in the r-FSH group, however these differences were not statistically significant. Although r-FSH is more expensive, the final treatment cost with r-FSH per pregnancy was slightly lower although this difference was not statistically significant.

türkiye klinikleri tıp bilimleri dergisi

Comparison of the Recombinant Versus Highly-Purified, Urinary Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (r-FSH vs. HP-uFSH) in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrom Patients who had Antagonist Cycle with In Vitro Fertilization- mbryo Transfer