English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

ABS TRACT Objective: This study tes ted whet her ex po su re to ide al thin fe ma le body ima ges ha ve an ef fect on ath le te and no nath le te fe ma les’ body ima ge (dis)sa tis fac ti on (BID) and so ci al physi qu e an xi ety (SPA). Ma te ri al and Met hods: The par ti ci pants we re 143 he althy fe ma le ath le tes (n= 67) and no nath le tes (n= 76) ran ging in age from 17 to 28. In ad di ti on to ath le tic sta tus, gro ups we re furt her di vi ded in to ex pe ri men tal and con trol gro ups (2 x 2 Fac to ri al de sign). In di vi du als in ex pe ri men tal gro ups vi e wed a sli de show which con ta i ned 37 thin fe ma le body ima ges from va ri o us swim su its ad ver ti se ments which we re se lec ted by thre e re fe re es. Af ter the ex pe ri ment, par ti ci pants comp le ted the Fi ve Fac tor Per so na lity In ven tory, SPA Sca le and BID Qu es ti on na i re. Body fat ra ti o was al so me a su red. In di vi du als in con trol gro ups comp le ted only me a su re ment de vi ces and the ir body fat ra ti o was me a su red. Re sults: Re sults sho wed that the re was a sig ni fi cant body ima ge sa tis fac ti on dif fe ren ce in fa vor of ath le tes’ ex pe ri men tal gro up (t (65)= -2. 23, p = 0.029). Ho we ver, the re was no sig ni fi cant dif fe ren ce bet we en no nath le tes’ con trol and ex pe ri men tal gro ups in terms of body ima ge sa tis fac ti on. Re sults re ve a led that fe ma le ath le tes (M :24.82, SD: 7.41) had sig ni fi cantly lo wer SPA than no nath le tes (M: 33.30, SD:7.50), [t (141): -6.78, p< 0.001]. Re sults al so de mons tra ted that fe ma le ath le tes had hig her body ima ge sa tis fac ti on (M: 109.10, SD: 9.96) com pa red to no nath le tes (M: 91.75, SD: 10.23), [t(141): 10.24, p< 0.001]. A reg res si on mo del con ta i ning the Big Fi ve per so na lity tra its co uld exp la in sig ni fi cant amo unt of va ri an ce in ath le tes’ and no nath le tes’ body ima ge sa tis fac ti on. Showing body fat ra ti o in cre a sed pre dic ti ve abi lity of the reg res si on mo del only in the ath le te gro up. Conc lu si on: Thin fe ma le body ima ges ide a li sed by me di a may le ad ne ga ti ve body ima ge per cep ti on es pe ci ally in fe ma le ath le tes.

The Effect of Female Media Body Images on Body Image Dissatisfaction in Female Athletes and Nonathletes