English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: To compare closure procedure with the nonclosure-peritoneum protocol during cesarean section. Study Design: Randomized control trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics &amp;Gynecology, District Headquarter Hospital, Gujranwala from 12th May 2018 to 12th November 2018. Methodology: One hundred females were enrolled and divided into two different groups. In first Group designated as “Group I” visceral peritoneum was closed with chromic 2/0 suture while in group II, no closure was done. According to VAS the post-op pain was noted. Results: The mean age of the females from closure group was 31.06±7.57 years while the mean age of the females from non-closure group patients was 31.78±7.59 years. There were 19 (19%) female were nulliparous. The post-operative pain was noted in 30(30%) females (P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Closure group females showed significantly lower post-operative pain after 24 hours of cesarean section delivery than non-closure females. Keywords: Caesarean section, peritoneum, Closure, Postoperative pain, delivery

Comparing Outcome of Peritoneal Closure with Nonclosure during Patients’ Caesarean Section