English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This practice note offers an analytical narrative that is intended to provoke thinking about the design of capacity development programmes. It takes as its example the IGAD Initiative, a regional capacity development initiative for South Sudan. Based on extensive fieldwork, the authors point out how some of the IGAD Initiative’s biggest successes have developed out of freedom, voluntarism and decentralised initiatives rather than through detailed top-down design and implementation. A vague project design appears to have afforded the space needed for capacity development to genuinely take the context as the starting point. The authors suggest that the IGAD experience provides important lessons for the discussion and design of capacity development initiatives in fragile states

By Design or by Default: Capacity Development in Fragile States and the Limits of Program Planning