English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

I agree with virtually all the points made in Kenneth Aitchison’s analysis of the role of an archaeological degree, the relationship between the archaeological degree and the archaeological profession and also with his desires for the future, so in that sense there is not much for me to discuss. However, I am a bit less convinced about his proposals for achieving the ends that he (and I) would like to see. It also seems to me that his analysis of the situation leads to rather ambivalent conclusions, on the one hand emphasising the value of the general dimensions of an archaeology degree, on the other urging a greater emphasis on archaeological employability.

Comment on "What is the Value of an Archaeology Degree?"